Sunday, October 21, 2007
Snow Falling On Cedars ~ Post 2
Sunday, October 14, 2007
Just another post on MEMOIRS
What power is there in telling our own stories?
People write memoirs because they want to protray their emotions towards situations in their life. People write memoirs to reflect on their life and help teach what they have learned to others. I believe that people write memoirs also for enjoyment purposes and for the love of writing. I think people write memoirs because they are easy to write because it's from their past experiences and a reflection of their life.
The power in telling our own stories is that it reveals more about yourself and gives a person a chance to reflect on their life. In doing so, good messages can be produced and life lessons taught. Memoirs have personal believes which you might not get from other types of writing.
YEAH MEMOIRS!
Sunday, October 7, 2007
::Snow Falling on Cedars::
My outside reading book is titled "Snow Falling on Cedars" and is was written by David Gutterson.
In the book "Snow Falling On Cedars", an accused man by the name of Kabuo faces his trial as a Japanese man in the midst of racial tensions on the San Piedro Island in 1954. Kabuo was accused for the murder of a local fisherman named Carl Heine. Carl Heine's boat, the Susan Marie was found stranded with all of its lights on. The county sheriff, Art Morgan was called on the morning of Carl's death (September 16, 1954) with his deputy Abel. On the Susan Marie, Carl could not be found, so Art and Abel put the fish net into the water and found Carl dead hanging on the fish net by his rain gear buckles. When he was out of the water, the sheriff noticed that Carl had been crushed about his left ear.
After Art Morgan testified, Nels Gudmundsson (the attorney who had been appointed to defend Kabuo Miyamoto) cross examines Art of the possibility that Carl's head could have been banged after his death in the process of bringing him out of the water due to his weight.
Shorty after this in the book we learn about Ishmael Chambers who is a writer for the San Piedro Review and is going to be writing an article about the trial.
Snow Falling on Cedars" as of so far is an excellent book, and I can't wait to see what happens next. I really enjoy how the author slowly brings in more of the story without first offering what actually happened, leaving you to figure it out.
Monday, October 1, 2007
Black Boy post NUMBER 2!
and what are the effects (positive and negative) of hunger?
Richard hungers for not only physical food, but also for fatherly affection and for societal knowledge. Richard, towards the beginning of the book associates his hunger with the absence of his father. Richard wants, or "hungers" for fatherly affection and for a father figure in his life. The effect of this hunger is that Richard is negatively angered at his father, or upset with himself for wanting his affection after he left him. Richard craves fatherly affection because his mother doesn't "satisfy" his hunger for affection.
Secondly, Richard hungers for food. Since his in malnurished, he seeks ways to get his hands on as much food as he can. As he realizes his hunger is always with him, he also notices the negative affects to his lack of food when he states, "But this new hunger baffeled me, scared me, made me angry and insisten" (Wright 14).
Lastly, Richard hungers for societal knowledge. The main example that stands out is his "hunger" to understand the racial divide between blacks and whites. At first he is naive and doesn't thinks that there possibly could be good white people, but then he begins to question their motives and to understand what the difference between blacks and whites actually is.
Tuesday, September 25, 2007
~Question Numero Uno~
In my opinion, Richard is not a "bad" boy. Yes, he does do many things that are inappropriate such as kill a cat, wander to saloons, get drunk, run away from an orphanage, and yell obscenities and write naughty words on windows. That could be enough evidence to point and say, yes, Richard is a "bad" boy, but in my opinion, he just didn't know any better. His actions were based on his surrounding environment.
Behavior should be blamed on the person when that person has grown up in an environment where there have been strict lines distinguishing between right and wrong. On the other hand, behavior should be blamed on environment when children are deprived of time with their parents and no one has told them the difference between what is socially acceptable and what isn't. Their behavior comes from only seeing and doing what they are told because they are naive and ignorant of how their actions effect others because no one has told them differently.
